52 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			52 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| 
								 | 
							
								---
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								tags:
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								  - Logic
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								  - propositional-logic
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								---
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								 > 
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								 > Two sentences, P and Q, are truth-functionally equivalent if and only if there is no truth assignment in which P is true and Q is false
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								### Informal expression
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								P: If it is raining then the pavement will be wet.
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								Q: The pavement is not wet unless it is raining.
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								### Formal expression
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								$$
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								P \supset Q \equiv \sim P \lor Q 
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								$$
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								### Truth-tables
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								P	Q				P	⊃	Q	
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								T	T					T		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								T	F					F		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								F	T					T		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								F	F					T
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								P	Q				~	P	∨	Q	
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								T	T						T		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								T	F						F		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								F	T						T		
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								F	F						T
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								````
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								### Derivation
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								 > 
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								 > Propositions $P$ and $Q$ are equivalent in a system of [derivation](Formal%20proofs%20in%20propositional%20logic.md) for propositional logic if $Q$ is derivable from $P$  and $P$ is derivable from $Q$.
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								Note that the property of equivalence stated in terms of derivablity above is identical to the derivation rule for the [material biconditional](Biconditional%20Introduction.md):
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								
							 | 
						|||
| 
								 | 
							
								//TODO: Add demonstration of this by deriving two equivalents from one of DeMorgan's Laws
							 |