37 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
![]() |
---
|
||
|
tags:
|
||
|
- propositional-logic
|
||
|
- logic
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Theorems and empty sets
|
||
|
|
||
|
We know that when we construct a
|
||
|
[derivation](Formal_proofs_in_propositional_logic.md#derivation-rules) we start
|
||
|
from a set of assumptions and then attempt to reach a proposition that is a
|
||
|
consequence of the starting assumptions. However it does not always have to be
|
||
|
the case that the starting set contains members. The set can in fact be empty.
|
||
|
|
||
|
_Demonstration_
|
||
|
|
||
|

|
||
|
|
||
|
We see in this example that there is no starting set and thus no primary
|
||
|
assumptions. Instead we start with nothing other than the proposition we wish to
|
||
|
derive. The proposition is effectively derived from itself. In these scenarios
|
||
|
we say that we are constructing a derivation from an **empty set**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Propositions which possess this property are called theorems:
|
||
|
|
||
|
> A proposition $P$ or a system of propositions in propositional logic is a
|
||
|
> theorem in a system of derivation for that logic if $P$ is derivable from the
|
||
|
> empty set.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We represent a theorem as:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
\vdash P
|
||
|
$$
|
||
|
|
||
|
(There is no preceding $\Gamma$ as the set is empty. )
|