> A fraction is said to be _reduced to its lowest terms_ if the [greatest common divisor](Factors%20and%20divisors.md#greatest-common-divisor) of the numerator and the denominator is $1$.
Thus the fraction $\frac{2}{3}$ is reduced to its lowest terms because the greatest common divisor is 1. Neither the numerator or the denominator can be reduced to any lower terms. In contrast, the fraction $\frac{4}{6}$ is not reduced to its lowest terms because the greatest common divisor of both 4 and 6 is 2, not 1.
\_Once we get to $\frac{3}{4}$ the greatest common divisor is 1, therefore $\frac{18}{24}$ has been reduced to its lowest terms \_.
### 2. Reducing in one step with the highest common divisor
In the previous example the reduction took two steps: first we divided by two and then we divided by three. There is a more efficient way: find the [highest common divisor](Factors%20and%20divisors.md#greatest-common-divisor) of the numerator and denominator and then use this as the basis for the reduction. With this method, the reduction can be completed in a single step.
The greatest common divisor of 18 and 24 is 6, thus:
The two methods above are not very systematic and are quite heuristic. The third approach is more systematic and relies on the [interchangeability of factors and divisors](Factors%20and%20divisors.md).
Instead of thinking asking what is the greatest common divisor of 18 and 24 we could ask: which single number can we multiply by to get 18 and 24? Obviously both numbers are in the six times table. This is therefore to say that 6 is a [factor](Factors%20and%20divisors.md#factors) of both: we can multiply some number by 6 to arrive at both 18 and 24. The numbers are 3 and 4 respectively:
Once we have reached this point, we no longer need the common factor 6, we can therefore cancel it out, leaving the multiplicands as the reduced fraction:
This is still a bit long-winded however particularly when finding the factors of larger numbers because we have to go through the factors of both numbers to find the largest held in common.
Now we apply canceling but we include the variable parts, treating them exactly the same as the coefficients. We break them out of their exponents however.